All Issue

2019 Vol.37, Issue 6

Article

User Consciousness Analysis of Bus Alternative DRT

노선버스 대체형 DRT 운행에 대한 이용자 의식분석

Kijun PARK1
,
Hun Young JUNG2*
박 기준1
,
정 헌영2*
1Researcher, Research Division of Urban Space, ChangWon Research Institute, Gyeongnam 51500, Korea
2Professor, Department of Urban Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
1창원시정연구원 도시공간연구실 연구원
2부산대학교 도시공학과 교수
* Corresponding Author
31 December 2019. pp. 445-457
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Population reduction and aging are progressing rapidly in the outskirts of local cities as the social movement of the population is concentrated in urban areas with relatively high levels of living SOC and jobs. With the decrease in population in the suburbs, while the demand for public transportation is gradually decreasing, it is expected that the financial burden on the local government for maintaining the existing bus system will increase. Governments and local governments are promoting the introduction of Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) to reduce the burden of financial support for buses while improving the transportation facilities for people in vulnerable areas in public transport services. Changwon City continues to increase funding for maintaining bus services operating in urban suburbs, and it is time to introduce DRTs for Replacement of bus service. In this study, for bus users in 39 villages in Changwon City’s route bus sparsely operated area, we derived factors favoring DRT for replacement of bus services. And, based on the theory of resistance of innovation, we investigated the factors of resistance to innovation in groups that did not adopt DRT. In this way, we tried to present the appropriate operation direction at the time of introducing the DRT for replacement of bus services in vulnerable areas in public transport services in Changwon City. The results of the research are expected to be used as policy data for the successful introduction of DRT for the reduction of the local government’s bus financial burden.

Keywords
demand responsive transport (DRT)
population decline
low birth rate and aging
region vulnerable to public transportation
binary logistic model
classification/ decision tree

생활 SOC 수준이 상대적으로 높고 일자리가 많은 도시 내부지역으로 인구의 사회적 이동이 집중되면서 지방 도시의 외곽지역에서는 인구감소와 고령화가 빠르게 진행 중이다. 외곽지역의 인구감소로 인해 대중교통의 수요는 점차 감소하는 반면, 기존 버스시스템의 유지를 위한 지자체의 재정부담은 점점 증가될 것으로 전망된다. 정부 및 지자체에서는 대중교통 서비스가 취약한 지역 주민의 이동편의 증진을 제고하면서 버스재정지원 부담을 줄이기 위해 수요응답형교통(Demand Responsive Transport, DRT)의 도입을 추진하고 있다. 창원시 또한 도시 외곽지역을 운행하는 버스서비스 유지를 위해 투입되는 재정지원금이 지속적으로 증가하고 있어 버스노선 대체형 DRT의 도입이 필요한 시점이다. 본 연구는 창원시의 노선버스 과소운행 지역 39개 마을의 버스이용자를 대상으로 버스노선 대체형 DRT 선호 요인을 도출하고, 혁신저항 이론을 바탕으로 대체형 DRT를 채택하지 않는 집단의 의사결정 과정에 미치는 혁신저항 요인을 알아보았다. 이를 통해 창원시의 노선버스 과소운행지역에 대체형 DRT 도입 시 적절한 운영 방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 연구의 결과는 향후 지자체의 버스재정지원금 부담 완화를 위한 노선버스 대체형 DRT의 성공적 도입 및 정착을 위한 정책 자료로서 활용될 것을 기대한다.

키워드
수요응답형교통
저출산 ‧ 고령화
인구감소
노선버스 과소운행 지역
이항로짓 모델
의사결정나무 분석
References
1
Amirgholy M., Gonzales E. J., (2016), Demand Responsive Transit Systems with Time-dependent Demand: User Equilibrium, System Optimum, and Management Strategy, Transp. Res Part B Methodological, 92, 234-252.
10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.006
2
Gomes R., de Sousa J. P., Dias T. G. (2015), Sustainable Demand Responsive Transportation Systems in a context of austerity: The case of a Portuguese city, Research in Transportation Economics, 51, 94-103.
10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.011
3
Jeon S. M., Chung S. B., Kim S. G. (2012), A Study on Analysis of Operating Cost Properties to Demand Responsive Transport System in Rural Areas, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers D, 32(6D), Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 571-577.
10.12652/Ksce.2012.32.6D.571
4
Jeon S. M., Jo G. S., Park W. I. (2012), Study on the Feasibility of Introduction of DRT in Rural Areas, Korea Research Institute of Transportation Industries, Seoul, South Korea.
5
Kim W. C., Namgung M. (2015), A Study on Fare Estimation for Demand Responsive Transport, J. Korea Inst. Intell. Transp. Syst., 14(1), The Korea Institute Of Intelligent Transport Systems, 103-111.
10.12815/kits.2015.14.1.103
6
Lee C. Y., Kim N. S. (2016), A Generation Strategy of Mixed Alternative of Bus with Demand Responsive Transport Using Strategy Generation Table, JKPA 51(1), Korea Planning Association, 189-200.
10.17208/jkpa.2016.02.51.1.189
7
Ministry of Land (2015), Guidelines for Implementing Demand Responsive Transport, Sejong, South Korea.
8
Neven A., Braekers K., Declercq K., Wets G., Janssens D., Bellemans T. (2015), Assessing the impact of different policy decisions on the resource requirements of a demand responsive transport system for persons with disabilities, Transp Policy, 44, 48-57.
10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.011
9
Palmer K., Dessouky M., Zhou Z. (2008), Factors influencing productivity and operating cost of demand responsive transit, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 42(3), 503-523.
10.1016/j.tra.2007.12.003
10
Park J. G. (2012), Twitter Adoption Model: Integrative Approach to Innovation Diffusion Theory, Technology Acceptance Model, and Model of Innovation Resistance, Internet and Information Security, 3(1), Korea Internet and Security Agency, 35-63.
11
Ram S. (1987), A Model of Innovation Resistance, ACR North American Advances, 14, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 208-212.
12
Rogers E. M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations(5th ed.), Simon and Schuster.
13
Sheth J. N. (1981), Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in Diffusion Research, Research in Marketing, 4(3), 273- 282.
14
Sung D. (2009), Study on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Risk of Mid-program Ads Affecting to Intention to Allow Mid-program Ads, Korean J. of Journalism and Communication Studies, 53(6), Korean Society For Journalism And Communication Studies, 379-404.
15
Wang C., Quddus M., Enoch M., Ryley T., Davison L. (2015), Exploring the Propensity to Travel by Demand Responsive Transport in the Rural Area of Lincolnshire in England, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(2), 129-136.
10.1016/j.cstp.2014.12.006
16
Yoon S. K., Kim M. J., Choi J. H. (2014), Effects of Innovation Characteristics and User Characteristics on the Adopting E-Books: Focused on Innovation Resistance Model, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(8), The Korea Contents Association, 61-73.
10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.061
17
Yun S. U. (2016), A Study of Integrative Adoption Model Regarding Social TV: Focused on Integrative Approach on Intention of Continuous Use Based on Innovation Diffusion Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Innovation Resistance Model, The Journal of Press Science, 16(2), Korean Regional Communication Research Association, 145-183.
10.14696/jcs.2016.06.16.2.145
18
Yun S. U., Ahn Y. H. (2003), Analysis of the Elderly's Travel Characteristics and Travel Behavior, JKPA 38(7), Korea Planning Association, 91-107.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Transportation
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한교통학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한교통학회지
  • Volume : 37
  • No :6
  • Pages :445-457
  • Received Date : 2019-08-12
  • Revised Date : 2019-09-25
  • Accepted Date : 2019-12-20
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2019.37.6.445
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Society of Transportation Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
Archives
: 2015 Vol.34~
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close